The Myth of Self-Correcting AI

The Myth of Self-Correcting AI

Why moral self-correction isn't innate in LLMs

This research examines whether Large Language Models can naturally self-correct moral judgments without explicit prompting or external feedback.

Key findings:

  • Self-correction is not an innate capability in LLMs but rather emerges through specific prompting techniques
  • Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning alone is insufficient for reliable moral self-correction
  • External feedback significantly improves correction performance
  • LLMs often struggle to detect moral errors in their own outputs without guidance

Security implications: Understanding these limitations is crucial for safely deploying LLMs in sensitive contexts where moral reasoning is required. Organizations must implement proper guidance mechanisms rather than relying on assumed self-correction abilities.

Self-correction is Not An Innate Capability in Large Language Models: A Case Study of Moral Self-correction

32 | 124